Activity of Spanish gastroenterology units before and after the COVID-19 pandemic: an assessment using the EFIC_AD tool, developed by the Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva (SEPD).

INTRODUCTION: the COVID-19 pandemic had a strong impact on the healthcare model. The Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva (SEPD) offered gastroenterology care units (UAAD) an instrument (EFIC_AD) to record and analyze their efficacy and efficiency. Thus, the impact of the pandemic on the activity of UAAD was assessed. METHODS: A descriptive study, based on the EFIC_AD registry for the period 2019-2021, of activity regarding admissions, clinic visits, and endoscopic as well as non-endoscopic tests, and endoscopy room performance. RESULTS: data were collected from up to 42 hospitals (22 with ≥ 500 beds). Overall, activity during 2020 compared to 2019 decreased by 12.30 % for admissions and 40 % for pH-metries (16.70 % for new clinic visits; 14.34 % for referrals from primary care; 24.70 % for gastroscopies; 32.50 % for colonoscopies; 31.00 % for endoscopic ultrasounds; 18.20 % for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCPs); 38.00 % for manometries; 23.60 % for abdominal ultrasounds; 36.17 % for liver transient elastographies [Fibroscan®]). The levels achieved during 2019 were not fully recovered during 2021 except for digestive motility studies, and virtually for endoscopy room performance rate (88.15 % in 2019; 67.77 % in 2020; 85.93 % in 2021). CONCLUSIONS: during 2020 the COVID-19 pandemic led to a markedly decreased in specific activities at UAAD, which was not fully recovered in 2021 despite endoscopy room performance return to normal.

Actividad de las unidades de aparato digestivo españolas antes y durante la pandemia COVID-19: evaluación mediante la herramienta EFIC_AD de la Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva (SEPD)

Introducción: la pandemia COVID-19 afectó intensamente el modelo asistencial sanitario. La Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva (SEPD) ofrece a las unidades asistenciales de aparato digestivo (UAAD) una herramienta (EFIC_AD) en la que registrar y analizar su eficacia y eficiencia. Sobre esta base se ha estudiado el impacto de la pandemia sobre la actividad de esas UAAD. Métodos: estudio descriptivo basado en el registro EFIC_AD durante el periodo 2019-2021 sobre la actividad en hospitalización, consulta y exploraciones endoscópicas y no endoscópicas y el rendimiento de las salas de endoscopia. Resultados: se recogieron datos de hasta 42 centros hospitalarios (22 de ellos ≥ 500 camas). En conjunto, la actividad en 2020, respecto a 2019, descendió entre un 12,30 % para los ingresos y un 40 % para las pHmetrías (16,70 % nuevos en consulta, 14,34 % derivaciones desde Atención Primaria, 24,70 % gastroscopias, 32,50 % colonoscopias, 31,00 % ecoendoscopias, 18,20 % colangiopancreatografías retrógradas endoscópicas [CPRE], 38,00 % manometrías, 23,60 % ecografías abdominales, 36,17 % elastografías transitorias hepáticas [FibroScan®]). Los niveles de 2019 no se recuperaron completamente en 2021 excepto para los estudios de motilidad digestiva, aunque sí en la práctica los de los rendimientos de las salas de endoscopia (88,15 % en 2019, 67,77 % en 2020, 85,93 % en 2021). Conclusiones: durante 2020, la pandemia COVID-19 provocó un destacado descenso de la actividad propia de las UAAD que no se recuperó totalmente en 2021, a pesar de la normalización de los rendimientos de las salas de endoscopia (AU)

Follow-Up Study Confirms the Presence of Gastric Cancer DNA Methylation Hallmarks in High-Risk Precursor Lesions.

To adopt prevention strategies in gastric cancer, it is imperative to develop robust biomarkers with acceptable costs and feasibility in clinical practice to stratified populations according to risk scores. With this aim, we applied an unbiased genome-wide CpG methylation approach to a discovery cohort composed of gastric cancer (n = 24), and non-malignant precursor lesions (n = 64). Then, candidate-methylation approaches were performed in a validation cohort of precursor lesions obtained from an observational longitudinal study (n = 264), with a 12-year follow-up to identify repression or progression cases. H. pylori stratification and histology were considered to determine their influence on the methylation dynamics. As a result, we ascertained that intestinal metaplasia partially recapitulates patterns of aberrant methylation of intestinal type of gastric cancer, independently of the H. pylori status. Two epigenetically regulated genes in cancer, RPRM and ZNF793, consistently showed increased methylation in intestinal metaplasia with respect to earlier precursor lesions. In summary, our result supports the need to investigate the practical utilities of the quantification of DNA methylation in candidate genes as a marker for disease progression. In addition, the H. pylori-dependent methylation in intestinal metaplasia suggests that pharmacological treatments aimed at H. pylori eradication in the late stages of precursor lesions do not prevent epigenome reprogramming toward a cancer signature.

HIV Coinfection Predicts Failure of Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir in Treatment-Naïve Noncirrhotic Patients With HCV Genotype 1.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of licensed direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimens is assumed to be the same for hepatitis C virus (HCV)-monoinfected patients (HCV-Mono) and HIV/HCV-coinfected patients (HCV-Co). However, the high sustained viral response (SVR) rates of DAA regimens and the small number of HIV-infected patients included in registration trials have made it difficult to identify predictors of treatment failure, including the presence of HIV. METHODS: We compared treatment outcomes for ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) against HCV G1 in treatment-naïve HCV-Mono and HCV-Co without cirrhosis in a prospective registry of individuals receiving DAAs for HCV. RESULTS: Up to September 2017, a total of 17 269 patients were registered, and 1358 patients (1055 HCV-Mono/303 HCV-Co) met the inclusion criteria. Significant differences between HCV-Mono and HCV-Co were observed for age, gender, and G1 subtype distribution. Among HCV-Co, 99.0% were receiving antiretroviral therapy. SVR rates for LDV/SOF at 8 weeks did not differ significantly between HCV-Mono and HCV-Co (96.9% vs 94.0%; P = .199). However, the SVR rate for LDV/SOF at 12 weeks was significantly higher for HCV-Mono than HCV-Co (97.2% vs 91.8%; P = .001). A multivariable logistic regression model including age, sex, liver stiffness, G1 subtype, HCV-RNA, HIV, and treatment duration showed the factors associated with treatment failure to be male sex (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.27-4.91; P = .008) and HIV infection (aOR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.13-4.38; P = .020). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this large prospective study analyzing outcomes for LDV/SOF against HCV G1 in treatment-naïve noncirrhotic patients suggest that HIV infection is a predictor of treatment failure in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

Genetic variation analysis in a follow-up study of gastric cancer precursor lesions confirms the association of MUC2 variants with the evolution of the lesions and identifies a significant association with NFKB1 and CD14.

Gastric carcinogenesis proceeds through a series of gastric cancer precursor lesions (GCPLs) leading to gastric cancer (GC) development. Although Helicobacter pylori infection initiates this process, genetic factors also play a role. We previously reported that genetic variability in MUC2 is associated with the evolution of GCPLs. In order to replicate previous results in an independent sample series and to explore whether genetic variability in other candidate genes plays a role in the evolution of GCPL, genomic DNA from 559 patients with GCPLs, recruited from 9 Spanish hospitals and followed for a mean of 12 years, was genotyped for 141 SNPs in 29 genes. After follow-up, 45.5% of the lesions remained stable, 37% regressed and 17.5% progressed to a more severe lesion. Genetic association with the evolution of the lesions (progression or regression) was analyzed by multinomial and binomial logistic regression. After correction for multiple comparisons, the results obtained confirmed the inverse association between MUC2 variants and the regression of the lesions. A significant association was also observed between NFKB1 and CD14 variants and the evolution of the lesions; interestingly, this association was with both progression and regression in the same direction, which could reflect the dual role of inflammation in cancer. Stratified analyses according to H. pylori virulence factors indicated some significant and differential effects but none of them passed the FDR test. These results confirm that genetic variability in MUC2, NFKB1 and CD14 may have a role in the evolution of the GCPLs along time and in gastric carcinogenesis.

Incomplete type of intestinal metaplasia has the highest risk to progress to gastric cancer: results of the Spanish follow-up multicenter study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: In high or moderate risk populations, periodic surveillance of patients at risk of progression from gastric precursor lesions (PL) to gastric cancer (GC) is the most effective strategy for reducing the burden of GC. Incomplete type of intestinal metaplasia (IIM) may be considered as the best candidate, but it is still controversial and more research is needed. To further assess the progression of subtypes of IM as predictors of GC occurrence. METHODS: A follow-up study was carried-out including 649 patients, diagnosed with PL between 1995-2004 in 9 participating hospitals from Spain, and who repeated the biopsy during 2011-2013. Medical information and habits were collected through a questionnaire. Based on morphology, IM was sub-classified as complete (small intestinal type, CIM) and incomplete (colonic type, IIM). Analyses were done using Cox (HR) models. RESULTS: At baseline, 24% of patients had atrophic gastritis, 38% CIM, 34% IIM, and 4% dysplasia. Mean follow-up was 12 years. 24 patients (3.7%) developed a gastric adenocarcinoma during follow-up. The incidence rate of GC was 2.76 and 5.76 per 1,000 person-years for those with CIM and IIM, respectively. The HR of progression to CG was 2.75 (95% CI 1.06-6.26) for those with IIM compared with those with CIM at baseline, after adjusting for sex, age, smoking, family history of GC and use of NSAIDs. CONCLUSIONS: IIM is the PL with highest risk to progress to GC. Sub-typing of IM is a valid procedure for the identification of high risk patients that require more intensive surveillance.

Usefulness of endoscopic ultrasonography in the clinical suspicion of biliary disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is a very sensitive and specific technique for the diagnosis of biliary diseases. This procedure has proven its usefulness in cases of high suspicion of biliary disease (history of gallstones and dilatation of the intrahepatic and/or extrahepatic bile ducts). We know less about its usefulness in cases of low suspicion of biliary pathology.The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of EUS in patients with low suspicion of biliary disease (patients with dilatation of the biliary tract were excluded). METHODS: 33 patients with low suspicion of biliary disease were recruited in 12 months. All of them had no biliary findings in a previous abdominal ultrasound and computer tomography scan. All of them underwent EUS and were studied prospectively. The diagnosis was confirmed by surgery and/or by ERCP in patients with positive EUS or clinical follow-up in those with normal EUS. Time of follow-up was 9 months (range, 3-12 months). RESULTS: seventeen patients (51.5%) presented with abnormal biliary findings on EUS (7 choledocholithiasis, 3 cholelithiasis, 2 choledocholithiasis + cholelithiasis and 5 microlithiasis). CONCLUSION: EUS is a useful and safe procedure for diagnosing patients with low suspicion of biliary disease.

Utilidad de la ultrasonografía endoscópica en la sospecha clínica de patología biliar / Usefulness of endoscopic ultrasonography in the clinical suspicion of biliary disease

Antecedentes y objetivos: la ultrasonografía endoscópica (USE) es una técnica muy sensible y específica para el diagnóstico de enfermedades biliares. Este procedimiento ha demostrado su utilidad en casos de alta sospecha de enfermedad biliar (historia de colelitiasis y dilatación de la vía biliar intra- y/o extrahepática). Sabemos menos sobre su utilidad en casos de baja sospecha de patología biliar. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la precisión diagnóstica de la USE en pacientes con baja sospecha de enfermedad biliar (los pacientes con dilatación de la vía biliar fueron excluidos). Métodos: 33 pacientes con baja sospecha de enfermedad biliar fueron reclutados en 12 meses. Todos ellos presentaban una ecografía abdominal previa y un TAC sin hallazgos relevantes. Todos se sometieron a una USE y se estudiaron de forma prospectiva. El diagnóstico fue confirmado con los hallazgos quirúrgicos y/o con la colangiopancreatografía retrógrada endoscópica (CPRE) en pacientes con USE positiva o con seguimiento clínico en pacientes con USE normal. El tiempo de seguimiento medio fue de 9 meses (3- 12 meses). Resultados: diecisiete pacientes (51,5%) presentaron patología biliar en la USE (7 coledocolitiasis, 3 colelitiasis, 2 colelitiasis + coledocolitiasis y 5 microlitiasis). Conclusión: la USE es un procedimiento útil y seguro para el diagnóstico de pacientes con baja sospecha de enfermedad biliar(AU)

Background and aims: endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is a very sensitive and specific technique for the diagnosis of biliary diseases. This procedure has proven its usefulness in cases of high suspicion of biliary disease (history of gallstones and dilatation of the intrahepatic and/or extrahepatic bile ducts). We know less about its usefulness in cases of low suspicion of biliary pathology. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of EUS in patients with low suspicion of biliary disease (patients with dilatation of the biliary tract were excluded). Methods: 33 patients with low suspicion of biliary disease were recruited in 12 months. All of them had no biliary findings in a previous abdominal ultrasound and computer tomography scan. All of them underwent EUS and were studied prospectively. The diagnosis was confirmed by surgery and/or by ERCP in patients with positive EUS or clinical follow-up in those with normal EUS. Time of followup was 9 months (range, 3-12 months). Results: seventeen patients (51.5%) presented with abnormal biliary findings on EUS (7 choledocholithiasis, 3 cholelithiasis, 2 choledocholithiasis + cholelithiasis and 5 microlithiasis). Conclusion: EUS is a useful and safe procedure for diagnosing patients with low suspicion of biliary disease(AU)